This post is dedicated to Kenny who urged me to quit complaining and write a bit.

Young, mid-twenties, blond haired woman: “Two for Slumdog.” Old white man in his Southern accent: “Hi, I would like four seniors for Slumdog Millionaire please.” I heard old, young, white, black, brown, most people in this long holiday line at an indie theatre in Pasadena chant for the latest “Danny Boyle” flick. What about Slumdog is different, is new, is so catchy that Hollywood is responding in such an unexpectedly devout manner? Is it A) Danny Boyle B) India C) Bollywood D) The new hip thing to do or E) All of the above. I wonder if Jamal Malik would get this answer exactly right.

I saw the film at a Fox sneak preview and was also enlightened by a not so enlightening Anil Kapoor who could only rave about his correct judgment (or rather his son’s correct judgment) of his participation in the film. Let’s just say that any detailed thought was just not within reach of his inspection of the film which, amongst other things, melted a childhood hero in front of my eyes.

During the last month, just silently observing filmmakers, peers in and out of the industry reacting to Slumdog Millionaire, I have been wondering what exactly about the film has translated to the West. I had a couple of control cases, what if some unknown director from India directed the flick; would it be as much of a sensation? Well, maybe they would direct it in Hindi and work with actors who subsequently were more accurate in their dialect and depiction of slum people. It would certainly be more “authentic” but would it be more popular? Clearly, by now you can guess that I think not. Danny Boyle, who I admire to the core as an adventurous filmmaker, clearly has the pull and the built-in fan audience to create the seed audience for the film and clearly his involvement is what has caused the initial snowball to form, the other factors which I will mention later, were in my opinion the grease for the snowball effect.

Hollywood is vastly interested in Bollywood these days. Whether it is Will Smith’s Overbrook investing or Yash Chopra’s Roadside Romeo cooperation with Disney or the Ambani-Spielberg-Dreamworks venture, there is clearly a foresight in the business titans of LA that India has and will be a big player in the movie business owing to the die-heart loyalty of film fans. They thought that Hollywood would probably not replace Bollywood films in India in terms of popularity, so why don’t we stark taking a bite out of the Bollywood industry, whether it is Saawariya or Singh is Kinng or Chandni Chowk to China Town? Smart I say. So the occasional eruption of the Bollywood or Bombay or Mumbai or India or Hindi or Yoga or Ashthram effect is clearly surfacing and resurfacing for the American audience and so here comes a film indulged in just enough authenticity of the “true” Bombay and just enough of a Bollywood style in terms of the love story and the shockingly much appreciated end credit song gag and just enough of logic to make it digestible to a self-taught and more knowledgeable audience, and boom, the volcano erupts, the fireworks are unleashed!

With the right timing, the right ingredients and the proper distribution plan, Slumdog Millionaire is easily this year’s favorite holiday cookie. It might even find itself an Oscar nomination or wow, even a win. Not to say that it is the best movie of the year, but clearly the most popular because by this time all you young ones hopefully know how the world, the industry, politics and its ranks work.

And for the few of us who wished that exhibition dollars aside, the film was in Hindi or Dev Patel worked a bit more on his accent, who cares. It is not about being perfect, it is about delivering at the right time with mostly the right ingredients and you have a happy film cast and crew, a happy studio and a happy American family returning from the theatres chanting, “Wow, I never saw that side of Mumbai, I guess they keep that away from the tourists.” To which I thought, “Taj to the dark limousine to Goa to the dark limousine to spas and yoga and massage to the dark limousine to the airport will certainly make you miss that side of Bombay…but then again, who cares and who is listening anyway!”

 


Comments

Balaji

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:57:35

I guess its the state of the economy wherein people want to get rid of their worries quickly thats contributing a lot to the success of this film.

Clearly, every one wants to make a quick buck in difficult times and when they see a movie like this, it satisfies their aspirational hunger. Also, the fact that so many major tie-ups are taking place between Hollywood and Bollywood that you have mentioned about weighs in heavily in the way the movie has been promoted in the West.

All said and done I am happy about the fact that Rahman is coming into limelight. Its my personal opinion that his work should have been given this recognition long ago (Dil Se days).

 

ipblsk

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:48:55

I agree with you Balaji, thanks for reading but Rahman sahab has been getting recognition for years...who says that Hollywood's recognition is the only plausible form of recognition. As far as I am concerned, they are so self-involved, that they are a non-entity in terms of international cinema!

 

Balaji

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:51:05

Well am not saying that Hollywood is the only plausible platform for recognition. However, all said and done Oscar is the biggest and grandest stage of them all and provides an artist with a Global audience reach...guess more people can enjoy his creation.

 

Mo-Tanweer

Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:09:33

In your note, it's not clear to me what you are arguing - are you saying that the film deserves its success or not?

And I disagree that Danny Boyle is central to this film's "seed audience" (as you call them). The seed audience comes from the Bollywood-watching audience in the West, who probably barely know Danny Boyle, but rather go because Odeon are showing an Indian film in English. That at least has been my experience in London.
Danny Boyle's "pull" in the film is simply that he gives it a unique touch (as he has done in previous movies).

There are many foreign language movies that do well in Hollywood, so if you think that if this movie was in Hindi it would not have had the same pull, can you not argue that that shows the movie is more limited than a prima facie?

P.S Someone should've told Anil Kapoor how to pronounce "Millionaire"!!!

Mo-Tan. :)x


 

yt

Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:43:59

yt

 

cait

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:37:53

I'll admit, the main draw for me was Danny Boyle. His movies can be hit or miss, but it's great when we get things like Trainspotting, 28 Days Later, even the first 2/3 of Sunshine, and now Slumdog Millionaire. As you said, Slumdog had both Boyle's name going for it, as well as being an uplifting movie during the worst recession in a long time. I'd also say, it works specifically in the West because it sticks to fairly universal concepts, steering clear of anything too specific to South Asian culture. On the one hand, it may not be authentic enough for purists, but it lets Western audiences connect when they otherwise might have difficulty. And in the end, I think it can benefit Bollywood's presence in the West. Slumdog has piqued our curiosity, and I wouldn't be surprised if a number of people, who would have dismissed Bollywood before, will now give it another look.

 

Blackvelveteene

Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:23:04

It was just a good movie. It was well written, well directed, it had phenomenal acting, it was exciting, the colors were vibrant and lively, the music was off the chain... It was just good. And anyone could watch it and get something from it. I think the big names were instrumental in actually getting the movie made, but good work speaks for itself in the box office.

I went to see it while in the south along with many young urbanites who had no idea who was involved in the film, but we had all heard that it was a great movie...

 



Leave a Reply